Should A Life Policy Be In A Revocable Trust?
So, do a revocable trust and a life policy go together?
Consider the pluses and minuses of a trust-owned contract:
- Cost – Creating the trust is an additional expense beyond the fees for the usual last will & testament, power-of-attorney, and health directive.
- Creditors – Unlike with an irrevocable trust, assets are not protected from claims against the grantor.
- Court – Death benefits are not subject to probate, but this may not be a compelling reason.Beneficiary designations (other than to the estate of the insured) serve to avoid probate court anyway.
- Continuity of Control – If an individual owner of a policy is not competent, or cannot be found, management of the policy is onerous. The trust can re-direct authority.
- Contingent Beneficiaries – This is the biggest advantage.Primary policy beneficiaries are usually simple (e.g., 100% to my spouse).Beyond that things can get complicated quickly (e.g., to my children).Must a child survive?Are there children of more than one marriage?Will distribution be equal among all?Is there a desire to manage the proceeds for a time prior to complete distribution?All these concerns are much better accommodated in a trust document than in the beneficiary box on a policy application.
If you have questions about a client policy and trust planning, or any other case planning issues, contact Tom Virkler, JD – Director of Advanced Markets, at 706-614-3796 or tom@cpsadvancedmarkets.com.
